One Step BackKnow where you stand
Regulation

EUDR vs the UK's deforestation rules: two regimes, one confused industry

Pilot post 1 — the wedge piece. ~5 min read.

12 Aug 2026 · 5 min read

Somewhere in the UK right now, a technical manager is being asked by a customer to "confirm EUDR compliance" for a product that never leaves Britain, made by a company that doesn't sell a single unit into the EU. They will spend an afternoon reading a law firm's briefing written for general counsel, a software vendor's blog written to sell a demo, and the Regulation itself — 71 pages of it — and come away knowing less than when they started.

I've watched this happen. So here's the version I wish someone had written: what EUDR actually is, what the UK's own rules actually are, how they differ, and what you should be doing about either — in the language we actually use on site.

EUDR in one paragraph

The EU Deforestation Regulation says: if you place cattle, cocoa, coffee, palm oil, rubber, soya, or wood (or products derived from them — chocolate, and yes, some tea-adjacent categories get dragged in via packaging and derivatives, check Annex I) on the EU market, you must prove the commodity wasn't grown on land deforested after 31 December 2020. Not "sustainably sourced". Not "certified". Geolocated to the plot of land it grew on, backed by a due diligence statement filed in the EU's system.

The dates, after two postponements: 30 December 2026 for large operators and traders, 30 June 2027 for micro and small enterprises. A Commission simplification review has already run this year, so details may still move — which is precisely why half the guidance you'll find online is out of date.

The UK's version is not the same animal

The UK has its own regime coming — Schedule 17 of the Environment Act 2021, the "Forest Risk Commodities" rules. In June 2026 the government confirmed it's going ahead, with regulations expected to reach Parliament in 2027. Two differences matter enormously:

1. Illegal vs all deforestation. EUDR bans commodities from any land deforested after the cutoff, legal or not. The UK rules only ban commodities produced on land that was deforested illegally under local law. If Brazil says clearing that plot was lawful, the UK is satisfied. The EU is not. Same shipment, two different answers.

2. The commodity lists differ. The UK list: cattle, cocoa, palm oil, rubber, soy. Coffee is on the EU list but — as things stand — not the UK's. Wood is handled separately in the UK under existing timber regs.

So "are we compliant with the deforestation rules?" is a broken question. There are two sets of rules, they measure different things, and one of them isn't even law yet.

Which deforestation rules apply to your site A decision flow. If your product reaches the EU market you are in EUDR scope from 30 December 2026. If you sell only in Great Britain you fall under the UK forest risk commodity rules expected in 2027, which cover illegal deforestation only. Northern Ireland is contested. Do you handle cattle, cocoa, coffee, palm, soy, rubber or wood? YES Does the finished product reach the EU market — including via customers? NO — GB ONLY YES UK FOREST RISK COMMODITIES Illegal deforestation only 5 commodities — no coffee, no wood Due diligence + annual reporting TO PARLIAMENT ~2027 EUDR Any deforestation after 31 Dec 2020 7 commodities + derived products Plot-level geolocation, DD statement 30 DEC 2026 · SME 30 JUN 2027 Selling into both? Both apply. Retail customers will push the stricter one down the whole chain. Supplying Northern Ireland? Contested under the Windsor Framework — put it on the risk register.
Certification is not an answer to this question. Rainforest Alliance, RSPO or Fairtrade evidence can support your due diligence, but neither regime accepts a certificate in place of it.

"But we're Rainforest Alliance certified"

Certification is the most common comfort blanket in these conversations, so let's be precise about what it buys you. RA, RSPO and Fairtrade certification is evidence you can use in your due diligence — some schemes are building geolocation data into their systems for exactly this reason. What it is not is compliance. EUDR explicitly does not accept certification as a substitute for your own due diligence statement. The regulator's position, stripped of politeness: nice certificate, now show me the polygons.

That gap — between what your certificate says and what the regulation demands — is where most of the industry's 2027 problems are currently being stored.

Northern Ireland, briefly

If you supply into NI, the Windsor Framework raises a genuinely awkward question about whether EUDR reaches you through the back door. There are UK manufacturers on the forums asking this exact question right now and getting shrugs. The honest answer today: it's contested, guidance is thin, and if NI is a material market for you, this belongs on your risk register with a named owner — not in the "someone should look into that" pile.

What to actually do — the Monday morning list

  1. Map your exposure in an afternoon. One spreadsheet: every raw material and packaging item containing cattle products, cocoa, coffee, palm oil, rubber, soy, or wood derivatives. Column for whether the finished product touches the EU market (including via your customers' exports — ask them).
  2. If you sell into the EU, or your customers do: your suppliers need to provide geolocation data and due diligence information. Get the question into your supplier questionnaires now — supplier lead times on this are brutal, and everyone upstream is being asked simultaneously.
  3. If you're UK-only: you're preparing for the 2027 UK rules, not EUDR — but expect EUDR questionnaires from customers anyway, because retailers are pushing one standard (usually the stricter one) down the whole chain.
  4. Stop treating certificates as the answer. Log what your certified supply chains can actually evidence — plot-level data or not — and flag the gaps.
  5. Date your sources. Any EUDR guidance written before December 2025 predates the second postponement and the simplification review. Bin it.

I'm a quality professional in UK food manufacturing. One Step Back exists because keeping up with this stuff is a second job nobody gives you hours for. If that's your life too — the newsletter is free: one plain-English update when something actually changes, nothing when it doesn't.

[→ Join the list]

Know where you stand

Briefings on what's coming, how to be ready for it, and what it actually means for your site. Free.